top of page

The Common Rule is a rule of ethics regarding biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects in the United States. These regulations governing Institutional Review Boards for oversight of human research came into effect in 1981 following the 1975 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki, and are encapsulated in the 1991 revision to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Title 45 CFR 46 (Public Welfare) Subparts A, B, C and D. Subpart A ("The Common Rule") is the baseline standard of ethics by which any government-funded research in the US is held, and nearly all academic institutions hold their researchers to these statements of rights regardless of funding.

 

This subject is very complicated so instead of reading voluminous pages, I am including charts and a PPT which are easier to read.

 

RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS NIH REGIONAL SEMINAR

http://slideplayer.com/slide/5352543/#

 

ETHICAL PRINCIPLES OF HUMAN SUBJECT PROTECTION

http://slideplayer.com/slide/5854774/#'

 

DATA SECURITY AND RESEARCH-COMPLETING REQUIRED FORMS

http://slideplayer.com/slide/6214856/

 

HIPPA PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY

http://slideplayer.com/slide/3812744/#

 

DRAWING THE LINES-WHAT NEEDS IRB REVIEW

http://slideplayer.com/slide/2801406/

ETHICAL ISSUES IN TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
http://slideplayer.com/slide/4924298/
 

BASICS OF HUMAN AND ANIMAL RESEARCH REGULATIONS

http://www.slideshare.net/theSCCE/203-50111321

 


NEW MODELS FOR DATA SHARING AND COLLABORATION TO IMPROVE HEALTH AND HEALTHCARE
http://www.slideshare.net/HealthDataConsortium/from-research-to-practice-new-models-for-datasharing-and-collaboration-to-improve-health-and-healthcare-52098303

Human Experimentation

They are using people they designate as Non-Humans - Targeted Individuals.

December 14, 2015

Review of Protections of Human Subjects Used For Research

Current laughable procedure of the Office for Human Research Protection at HHS requires human subjects without consent, to provide evidence of wrongdoing, and to identify the lead researcher. How is the human subject without consent to know and do that? Within a university setting the IRB can withhold funding without informed consent. But if funding is non institutional and researchers do not obtain consent there are no protections from egregious abuse by miscreant researchers. 

Even if performed on university property which violates the Common Rule (Title 45 CFR Section 46). There are no penalties for non compliance with the Common Rule. Psychiatrists are readily available to cover-up illegal abuses designating the victim insane. Then there is the lack of oversight by state authorities when deaths occur in research. MA law requires notice to the Medical Examiner or the District Attorney. But police conveniently allow researchers to investigate deaths occurring under their procedures. Thus negligence becomes pre-existing conditions.

RULES FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH REGULATIONS

FUTURE STRATEGIC ISSUES FUTURE WARFARE 2025

https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/future-strategic-issues-and-warfare-pdf.3295/

 


U.S. “HUMAN BRAIN PROJECT”

  • Begun in early 90’s, funded by 16 organizations across 5 agencies (NIH, NSF, DOD, NASA, DOE)

  • AKA “ Neuroinformatics” (intersection of neuroscience and informatics)

  • “Exploding field;” 10,000 individual presentations at annual meeting of Society for Neuroscience (from

  • molecular geneticists to cognitive psychologists)

  • Determining detailed neuroanatomy of human brain (“digital brain atlas”)

  • Use of IT to study brain, use of brain info to aid IT/AI
     

Human Research

This is a great place to add a tagline.

Tell customers more about you. Add a few words and a stunning pic to grab their attention and get them to click.

​

This space is ideal for writing a detailed description of your business and the types of services that you provide. Talk about your team and your areas of expertise. 

bottom of page