Eight Objects over Hawaii at time of Fire!

Steve Favis video on Rumble-Click image

Official Story: The "green" laser lights sweeping over Hawaii's sky. This footage is from January 28, 2023 (filmed by Japan's Subaru Telescope on Mauna Kea, Big Island—not Maui), and shows lights from China's Daqi-1 atmospheric monitoring satellite using a green LIDAR (laser radar) for environmental scanning. It predates the August fires by over six months and is unrelated—fact-checked extensively as misinformation tied to DEW theories.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-maui-wildfire-space-satellite-video-217456999175

Were satellites involved?
Possibly, but the anomalies that occurred were possible using atmospheric heaters, ships, radomes on land and ships, lasers, high-powered microwaves mounted on ships and on land, planes, drones, helicopters. Anything that possibly could create a monster fire but hide who done it, will have been used. The giveaway as to what they actually used is somewhere in the science.

NORAD ID 53250 is actually a Starlink satellite (STARLINK-4059, launched by SpaceX in 2022), not Chinese-owned or operated.

Something else a little strange the day before the fire, the University of Hawaii published this picture of a green beam because it was in their eyes unusual on 8-7-2023. It was removed from the internet later that day. It was captured on camera and put back on the internet. It is unknown as to why we see it or why it was removed, just another strange thing surrounding the very strange events of 8-8-2023. The picture to the right is a closeup of the green beam.

The Power of These Satellites Is Deeply Troubling

UPDATE! Missing Children + School Bus Mystery | Maui Massacre

In the video above "High powered plasma bursts", you see flashes in the sky amidst the smoke. Obviously, without even being able to prove it, people knew that directed energy was used in this fire. Humans use lived experience, intuition, moral judgment, and the ability to sense when something doesn’t ring true. Humans with discernment often spot this before proof is available. Discernment comes from being embodied, social, and accountable in the real world. This is why people know that the official narrative about the Lahaina fire is not true. Let's find out the truth by learning the science.

These fires have become a pattern now - Gatlinburg, Paradise, Maui and California. They all have the same anomalies--complete combustion, high temperature melts steel, aluminum and glass. The pattern of blue and red things not burning also means the fire had assistance from a particular wavelength of light. It could be IR light, infrared which the human eye can't see, but IR can appear blue, depending on the medium used. Someone added some energy into the Lahaina fires because what was meant to burn was burned completely, quickly and left blue objects. Keep your discernment and use everything at your disposal to ferret out the truth.

In a typical fire, it is generally true that (1) houses are left black and charred, and (2) objects are usually only partly burned, with parts of structures and contents still standing.

Charring indicates incomplete combustion. That’s what most people see in house fires, campfires, wildfires that move through vegetation slowly and fires with limited oxygen or moderate temperatures. Partial burning is common in most fires because heat is uneven, oxygen is uneven and time of exposure varies. As a result some items ignite, others only scorch, thick structural elements survive, metal deforms but remains recognizable and objects remain in place. In Lahaina, the buildings and their contents burned completely which means it was not a normal fire. Oxygen had to enter the natural processes in order to create extreme heat evenly for the length of time to burn.

Very high heat + enough oxygen = clean burn. When temperatures exceed
roughly 800–1,100°C (1,500–2,000°F) for long enough, you get little to no
charring, near‑complete oxidation, light‑colored ash, minimal recognizable
debris, objects that appear “gone”. Fire behavior changes radically with wind,
fuel type, oxygen supply and heat duration.️ The absence of objects means
they burned completely. Science tells you this was not an ordinary fire.

This is combustion physics. Wind‑driven fires behave very differently. Strong wind pushes oxygen into the fire, strips heat away from flames and transfers it forward, carries burning embers far ahead and ignites structures directly without surrounding fuel burning first. In these cases, houses can burn from the inside out, trees nearby may only scorch or remain standing, one structure is destroyed, the next survives and foundations and chimneys remain, contents vanish. This is well documented fire behavior, especially in wind‑driven urban fires, wildland‑urban interface fires and fires with gusts above ~30–40 mph. The (1) extreme winds in Lahaina on August 8, 2023 were extremely rare at 80-90 mph. Their coincidence with the (2) fire, (3) a strong pacific high pressured area north of Hawaiʻi, (4)a tight pressure gradient enhancing NE trade winds, (5) organized cloud streets impacting NE coasts, (6) strong trade-wind inversion, (7) fast flow at mountain-top level and (8) the downslope windstorm on the SW side was an orchestrated one-time event. The pattern of blue and red things not burning also means the fire had assistance from a particular wavelength of light. It could be IR light (can appear blue). Energy was added into the Lahaina fires because what was meant to burn was burned completely and quickly. High winds alone does not explain everything. The planners of this abomination organized to make all these things happen at once and then start the fire. They all had to happen at once for this to happen at all. This is the tell, that this was a man-made event.

HOW DO THEY DO IT????
Why everything burns to ash??

Lahaina was not “just” a wildfire—it was a wind-driven, electrically enabled, ion-rich urban firestorm operating outside the assumptions of most fire behavior models. Science behind coupling mechanism responsible for Microwave (typically 2.45 GHz) and millimeter-wave electromagnetic fields can couple with flames to generate non-equilibrium plasma, enhancing combustion processes. This interaction accelerates flame propagation, extends lean/rich burn limits, improves efficiency (complete burn), and reduces emissions by producing active species (e.g., excited electrons, radicals like O and OH) that promote faster chemical reactions.

IT'S ABOUT THE SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLE OF COUPLING

Microwave (typically 2.45 GHz) and millimeter-wave electromagnetic fields can indeed couple with flames to generate non-equilibrium plasma, enhancing combustion processes [complete combustion to ash]. This interaction accelerates flame propagation, extends lean/rich burn limits, improves efficiency, and reduces emissions by producing active species (e.g., excited electrons, radicals like O and OH) that promote faster chemical reactions.

Key Coupling Mechanisms

• EM Field Interaction: The oscillating electric field accelerates free electrons in the flame (from chemi-ionization). These energetic electrons collide with neutral molecules, creating more ionization and excitation without significantly heating the bulk gas (non-thermal plasma effect).
  

• Plasma Formation: Residual electrons from initial spark or flame absorb microwave energy, sustaining/growing plasma. This often manifests as a plasma jet or expanded discharge that propels the flame front outward.
  

• Chemical Enhancement: Plasma generates radicals and excited species, lowering activation energies for reactions, enabling ignition in leaner mixtures or at lower temperatures. Studies show flame speeds increasing by 20% or more, with velocity matching between faster plasma expansion and flame front being critical for acceleration.
  

• Diagnostics Role: Optical methods (e.g., Schlieren imaging, OH/CO laser-induced fluorescence, emission spectroscopy) reveal brighter OH signals, higher electron temperatures (~7,000 K hotter), and directional plasma jets wrinkling/pushing the flame surface.

The coupling of wind, fire, oxygen, and plasma involves complex interactions where plasma (ionized gas) influences fire chemistry and dynamics, wind (fluid flow) transports heat and reactants, oxygen fuels combustion, and these elements together enhance or suppress fire, seen in applications from plasma-assisted combustion (improving efficiency) to wildfire modeling (wind driving fire spread).

Plasma introduces reactive species like O and OH that speed up reactions (kinetic enhancement) while also adding heat (thermal effects). Wind affects fire's physical spread, while oxygen's role as an oxidizer is fundamental, and plasma can alter local oxygen levels or create highly reactive oxygen forms, creating intricate feedback loops crucial for understanding and controlling combustion.

Below is a concise, technical overview of how wind, fire, electricity, and ions are physically coupled. These phenomena interact through fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, electromagnetism, and plasma/ion chemistry.

1. Wind–Fire Coupling (Fluid Dynamics & Combustion)

Mechanisms

• Oxygen supply: Wind increases combustion rate by enhancing oxygen transport to the flame front.

• Flame tilt and spread: Wind bends flames, increasing convective and radiative heat transfer to unburned fuel.

• Turbulence generation: Wind–terrain interactions create eddies that destabilize flames and promote spotting.
  

Consequences

Faster fire spread rates

• Increased fire intensity

• Formation of fire-induced flows (e.g., fire whirls)
  

2. Fire–Electricity Coupling (Electrostatics & Plasma Formation)

Mechanisms

• Thermal ionization: High flame temperatures (≈1,000–2,000 K locally higher in hotspots) partially ionize gases, producing free electrons and ions.

• Charge separation: Differential mobility of electrons vs. ions, plus particle-laden smoke, leads to net electric fields.

• Triboelectric effects: Collisions among ash, soot, and debris generate static charge.
  

Consequences

• Measurable electric fields above fires

• Electrical discharges in extreme fires (pyro-electrical activity)

• Modification of local atmospheric conductivity
  

3. Fire–Ion Coupling (Ion Chemistry)

Mechanisms

• Chemi-ionization: Combustion reactions directly produce ions (e.g., CHO⁺, NO⁺).

• Aerosol charging: Smoke particles acquire charge through ion attachment.

• Thermal diffusion: Ions migrate along temperature gradients.

Consequences

• Ion-rich plumes

• Altered recombination rates in the lower atmosphere

• Enhanced electrical coupling with the environment
  

4. Wind–Electricity Coupling (Atmospheric Electricity)

Mechanisms

• Charge transport: Wind advects charged particles and ions, redistributing electric fields.

• Dust and aerosol electrification: Wind-driven particles generate electrostatic charge.

• Conductivity gradients: Wind mixes air masses with different ion densities.
  

Consequences

• Variability in near-surface electric fields

• Enhanced lightning potential in disturbed atmospheres

• Coupling between fires and thunderstorm development (pyrocumulonimbus)
  

5. Integrated System: Wind–Fire–Electricity–Ion Feedback Loop

Feedback Pathway

1. Wind intensifies fire behavior.

2. Fire generates ions, charged aerosols, and strong updrafts.

3. Charged plumes create electric fields.

4. Electric fields influence ion motion, particle aggregation, and plume dynamics.

5. Modified plume dynamics feed back into wind and fire behavior.
   

Extreme Case

• Large wildfires can generate pyroconvective storms with lightning, effectively coupling combustion, atmospheric flow, and electrical systems.
  

Practical Domains Where This Coupling Matters

• Wildfire behavior modeling

• Atmospheric electricity and lightning forecasting

• Plasma-assisted combustion research

• Environmental monitoring and remote sensing

• Defense and high-energy atmospheric studies

Photographed in Lahaina:
This is a carbonized human body (charred and blackened, with a hardened, brittle appearance resembling charcoal), which typically results from exposure to intense, prolonged heat in a fire, which stopped short of completely burning to ash in the Lahaina fire. There is another body with the same details higher up in the frame. They appear to be laying in the street. This is the condition the bodies of people in Lahaina would have been found. Whole families were found huddled together in their homes. The same were found in cars and under cars trying to hide. Some died on the rocks by the ocean.

Carbonization of a human body—where soft tissues pyrolyze (break down via heat in low oxygen), leaving a blackened, carbon-rich residue—begins around 250–550°C (480–1,020°F) for initial charring, but full carbonization (turning tissues dark and brittle) generally requires higher sustained temperatures, often 600–900°C (1,100–1,650°F) or more, depending on duration and conditions.

In controlled cremation ovens (which achieve rapid, complete reduction to ash), temperatures of 670–980°C (1,240–1,800°F) typically carbonize and then calcinate (whiten and powder) the body in 2–3 hours.

For a body to reach a similar heavily carbonized state in about one day (e.g., in a house fire, wildfire, or vehicle fire), the ambient fire temperature would need to stay consistently high—likely 700–900°C (1,300–1,650°F) or above—for much of that time, with good oxygen flow and fuel to sustain it. Real-world fires vary widely: house fires often reach 700–1,000°C in hot spots but can drop lower, while wildfires or intense blazes can hit similar ranges. Lower sustained temperatures (e.g., below 500–600°C) might char the surface but not produce such deep, uniform carbonization over a full day.

Factors like body position, clothing, fuel source, and oxygen availability also affect the outcome. Complete reduction to ash (beyond just carbonization) usually takes longer unless temperatures are very high.

Psalm 18:8 (ESV): "Smoke went up from his nostrils, and devouring fire from his mouth; glowing coals flamed forth from him". The "snorting" or "flaring nostrils" evokes an enraged, powerful being, like a charging animal, showing God's intense displeasure with injustice. The stench of this massacre has been received in Gods domain. This massacre will be accounted for.

SHRINKAGE: The carbonized body in the image appears shrunken (likely to roughly 50–70% of its original size or less, based on the starfish-like, compacted posture and reduced proportions), which is a common effect in severe fire exposure. This shrinkage occurs for several reasons:

1. Dehydration and Loss of Water. The human body is about 60–70% water. Intense heat rapidly evaporates this moisture from soft tissues, causing them to contract and shrivel. This alone can reduce overall volume significantly. [You can see where the body fluids left a stain on the cement around the body. This is most likely a female with cornrows in her hair. She had been planning on enjoying her day with her hair so pretty.]

2. Thermal Shrinkage of Soft Tissues. As heat denatures proteins and causes muscle fibers, tendons, and connective tissues to coagulate and shorten, the body contracts. This is what produces the characteristic pugilistic attitude (boxer-like pose with flexed limbs), where muscles shrink and pull joints into flexion. Skin splits, fat liquefies and burns away, and organs dehydrate and shrink dramatically (sometimes called "puppet organs" in forensics).

3. Mass Loss from Combustion and Vaporization. Soft tissues (muscle, fat, organs) pyrolyze (break down under heat), releasing gases (like water vapor, CO₂, and other volatiles) and burning away. This results in major mass reduction—a typical adult body loses 80–90% or more of its mass during full cremation, leaving only bone fragments. In carbonization (as seen here), much of the organic material turns to brittle char, with the remaining structure compacted.

4. Bone Shrinkage and Warping. Bones themselves shrink (typically 5–20% in length, more in width/thickness) due to dehydration of collagen and changes in the mineral matrix (hydroxyapatite) at temperatures above ~600–800°C. This contributes to the overall reduced size and brittle, star-like appearance in the image.

In a one-day fire (or similar prolonged exposure), these processes can be pronounced if the fire is intense and sustained. The exact degree of shrinkage depends on factors like temperature, duration, oxygen availability, and body position.

What kind of weapon would be needed to perform the rapid carbonization (e.g., minutes to hours across the whole body)?

• Continuous-wave or high-duty-cycle laser: Tens to hundreds of kilowatts (kW) to megawatts (MW) sustained, focused over a large area or rapidly scanned.

• Pulsed lasers (e.g., high-energy femtosecond systems like ZEUS at 2 petawatts peak): These deliver massive instantaneous power but only in tiny fractions of a second, causing localized explosions/vaporization (e.g., shockwaves or plasma). They can uniformly carbonize/shrink an entire body without multiple overlapping pulses, with absurd energy input.

There was an AC-130 and a CH-53E videoed at Lahaina on the day of the fire.

Infrared Countermeasure Systems: Several military transport aircraft, such as the C-17 Globemaster III, AC-130, MC-130, CV-22, and CH-53E Super Stallions, use laser-based infrared countermeasure systems (LAIRCM)

Looking into the aircraft on Maui the day of the fire.
Either of these could bear the weight of an installation of massive lasers + equipment

This is a AC-130 Hercules.

DAYTON, Ohio — A decommissioned C-130 Hercules Air Force cargo plane has been delivered to the University of Dayton for research on cost-effective ways to keep older C-130s flying. University of Dayton Research Institute researchers are teaming with the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center’s Product Support Engineering Division and the AFLCMC C-130 Program Office to test and demonstrate new technologies on the plane, once it’s assembled.https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2019/05/26/university-receives-c-130-air-force-plane-for-research/

Helicopters

• AH-64D/E Apache attack helicopter: This helicopter is the primary user of the AN/APG-78 Longbow fire-control radar, is a Ka-band mmWave system housed in a dome above the main rotor. As of late 2025, this system remains the only fielded mmWave fire-control radar on an attack helicopter, capable of tracking up to 256 targets and engaging 16 simultaneously. and enables the helicopter to engage targets in all weather conditions, even when the helicopter is behind obstacles.

• MH-60R/S Seahawk, MH-60 Black Hawk (DAP), AH-1Z Viper, OH-58F Kiowa, AH-6 Little Bird, and MQ-1C Gray Eagle UAVs: These platforms are all capable of launching the AGM-179 Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM), which uses both semi-active laser and MMW radar for terminal guidance.

Fixed Wing Aircraft

• F/A-18C/D Hornet, F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, and EA-18G Growler: These U.S. Navy and Marine Corps aircraft, as well as the Royal Australian Air Force's Growlers, deploy the AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM), which features a cutting-edge MMW terminal guidance seeker.

• Tornado Electronic Combat and Reconnaissance aircraft: The German and Italian Air Forces use AARGM on their Tornado aircraft.

• F-15E Strike Eagle, F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF): The F-15E is currently approved for operational use of the GBU-53/B StormBreaker smart weapon, which utilizes a tri-mode seeker including all-weather MMW radar guidance. Integration activities are also ongoing for the F-35 and the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.

Millimeter wave (MMW) technology in military aviation is primarily used for advanced radar and targeting systems on several U.S. and allied aircraft, and as part of the guidance seeker in modern missiles, rather than as a direct, standalone "weapon" in the traditional sense. Aircraft and weapons systems incorporating MMW technology include:

The Apache AH-64 helicopter uses a low-power laser for targeting and guiding missiles (a laser designator), not as a direct combat weapon to destroy targets by itself. However, the U.S. military is actively developing and deploying several high-energy laser (HEL) weapons for direct combat roles, primarily against drones, rockets, artillery, and mortars.

The laser system currently on the AH-64 Apache is an integral part of its targeting system:

• Target Designation: The Apache's laser is used to "paint" a target with a high-intensity, coded laser beam that the AGM-114 Hellfire missile's seeker tracks to impact.

• Guidance Role: The laser acts as a guide for the missile, which then uses the reflected light to steer itself to the target.

• Vulnerability: This system requires the helicopter (or a friendly ground unit) to keep the laser focused on the target until impact, which can expose the aircraft to enemy fire.

The U.S. Army has also tested integrating actual high-energy combat lasers onto an Apache for counter-drone missions on an experimental basis, but this is not standard operational equipment.

The U.S. military is currently fielding or testing several other high-energy laser weapon systems for defensive and offensive purposes:

• Palletized High Energy Laser (P-HEL): A 20-kilowatt system deployed by the Army in the Middle East for use against enemy drones. It has reportedly achieved kills against incoming threats in operational environments.

• Directed Energy Maneuver-Short Range Air Defense (DE M-SHORAD): A 50-kilowatt laser mounted on a Stryker combat vehicle, intended to provide short-range air defense against drones, rockets, and mortars.

• High-Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS): A 60-kilowatt system installed on U.S. Navy destroyers (such as the USS Preble) to counter unmanned aerial systems and small boats.

• High-Energy Laser Weapon System (HELWS): A 10-kilowatt system developed by Raytheon that the Air Force has deployed overseas for base defense against drones.

• Indirect Fire Protection Capability-High Energy Laser (IFPC-HEL): A powerful 300-kilowatt system under development by the Army, designed to counter cruise missiles and other advanced threats.

These modern high-energy lasers function by converting electrical power into an intense beam of photons that heats, melts, or burns through the target material, destroying it physically. They offer the advantages of low cost per shot and a nearly infinite magazine, provided a sufficient power source is available.

BOTHELL, Wash., Sept. 15, 2022 – Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) delivered to the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research & Engineering OUSD (R&E) a new benchmark: a tactically-relevant electric 300 kW-class laser, the most powerful laser that Lockheed Martin has produced to date. This 300 kW-class laser is ready to integrate with the DOD demonstration efforts including the U.S. Army’s Indirect Fires Protection Capability-High Energy Laser (IFPC-HEL) Demonstrator laser weapon system.

There are other helicopters fitted with lasers that are used for combat like the Apache AH-64 by 2025. A helicopter carrying a microwave weapon or a high powered laser designed for use in these fires would be designed to hover, holding a laser on one area, creating a hot spot which would spontaneously combust from the heat or make a fire hotter. The Apache carries an infrared laser, oh, but its for something other than burning people asleep in their beds. The infrared laser is invisible so they could hover a kilometer away and burn people for a long time.

A CH-53K King Stallion can fly high enough that it would be effectively invisible and inaudible to a person on the ground. It solves the heavy duty equipment problem. It could carry a large laser, its power generator and cooling machinery.

Invisibility
The CH-53K has a service ceiling of around 14,400 to 16,200 feet (approx. 4,400 to 4,900 meters). Modern airliners typically cruise at much higher altitudes (around 40,000 feet), but even at its operational ceiling, the helicopter would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to see with the naked eye under normal conditions.

Inaudibility
The helicopter is known to be very loud, especially at low altitudes. However, sound dissipates with distance. At an altitude of several thousand feet, particularly near its service ceiling, the noise would likely blend into background ambient noise, weather, or simply be too faint to be heard from the ground. In one documented instance, a CH-53K at low altitude (around 100 feet) registered over 96 decibels for an observer, but the noise level dropped significantly when the helicopter moved three-quarters of a mile away. At an altitude of several thousand feet, the sound would be virtually inaudible.

Therefore, by flying at high altitudes, the CH-53K King Stallion could achieve the condition of being both unseen and unheard from the ground. It could hover, using its specially mounted laser or HPM's, whichever they are using. They could mount both of them on this mighty mover of a helicopter.

The extreme fires have been happening for quite a few years now and the military says it doesn't have lasers on planes because of the power/heat management.

The next thing to look at would be helicopters. The military needs to move large amounts of cargo and troops. Enter the CH-53K® King Stallion helicopter, the military's largest helicopter which took the place of the CH-53E Super Stallion.

For the U.S. Marine Corps, CH-53K aircraft are critical land and sea-based logistics connectors. International militaries can operate these aircraft for long-range air assault, special operations, humanitarian assistance, and search and rescue.

The combined power from each CH-53K aircraft’s three 7,500 shaft horsepower engines can lift three times the load of its CH-53E predecessor. It would be powerful enough and it would have the space to carry a laser and its cooling system. It can be refueled in the air. The "spire" on the front of a CH-53K helicopter is an aerial refueling probe. This long, rigid probe allows the helicopter to refuel in mid-air from a tanker aircraft (such as a KC-130J) without having to land,This is a very good choice for the aircraft that would be above the fires using a laser on the people in their homes while they sleep.

This is a picture of a CH-53K(or E) that was flying over Lahaina, Maui on August 8, 2023, the day of the fire. The official story is there were none of these at Lahaina on August 23, 2023. Well there was. It could be carrying the laser which hovers until the target combusts. It can refuel in the air, that's what the long arm is in the front is for-docking in the air.

Maui Coincidences? Or Mass Murder Via the U.S Military & W.E.F. It Could Be Us Next Time

Maui Fire Anomalies Directed Energy Weapons Lahaina Hawaii Land Grab Michelle Melendez Victor Hugo

There are so many parts to this massacre. We know from the publication to the right that natural weather systems were well studied and documented. Their inputs of energy needed to create an extreme wind were calculated to occur simultaneously with the fire they started.

1. The 80 mph winds started at sea. Enhance the wind, creating coherent banks of clouds. This may have used an atmospheric heater to enhance the natural processes already existing. This would require a meteorological team to know what the processes of wind and water and energy in the Pacific ocean. It could have included the formation or enhancement of Hurricane Dora.

2. High winds in Lahaina, Maui, on August 8, 2023, began in the early morning hours. Significant straight-line winds (downslope winds driven by a high-pressure system started impacting the town during the early morning of August 8. The official story is that the initial brush fire ignited around 6:22–6:30 a.m. HST, when "power poles toppled due to gusts," sparking a fire that was contained by 9 a.m.

3. Start the fire by blowing up a transformer in the forest. This was on video. There were cameras recording in various places in the reserve. One camera caught the explosion supposedly of a transformer, or something related to a power pole and the power went out in the area. There were several smaller flashes. One of them caught two figures, one walking, the other, just the head, some distance away from the fire. It looks as though they are wearing hazmat suits. It looks like they started the forest fire by remote control. There was quite an explosion.

This device is a Remote Laser Disrupter (also called a Remote Laser Firing System for Explosive Disrupter), used primarily for explosive ordnance disposal (EOD). It remotely burns or ablates the casing of unexploded bombs or suspicious explosives from a safe distance (typically 30–300 meters), causing low-order deflagration or disruption without direct contact.

It is manufactured by Beijing Heweiyongtai Sci & Tech Co., Ltd. (commonly known as Hewei or Heweiyongtai), a Chinese company specializing in police, military, and security equipment.

The setup in the image matches product photos and descriptions from their listings:

• Tripod-mounted laser emitter with camera/zoom optics.

• Pelican-style hard cases for the laser power unit/control system.

• Red cable for power/connection.

• Often includes a tablet for wireless control.

Similar products exist from other manufacturers (e.g., PacSci EMC for fiber-optic laser initiators), but this specific portable, high-power (500W+), tripod-based disrupter design is from Hewei.

There is an airborne version of the laser ignition systems for forest management primarily using drones (UAS) to deploy Delayed Aerial Ignition Devices (DAIDs) (like "dragon eggs") or even high-powered CO2 lasers for precise ignition, aiming to create controlled burns (back-burns) from above, reducing risk to personnel and efficiently managing fuel loads, with technologies like LIDAR also mapping fuels from the air.

1. Platform: A drone (Uncrewed Aerial System) carries the ignition payload.

2. Payload: Plastic spheres (like ping pong balls) filled with chemicals (e.g., potassium permanganate).

3. Deployment: The drone drops these spheres at targeted locations.

4. Ignition: Upon hitting the ground (or shortly after), a chemical reaction starts, igniting the forest fuel.

5. Control: Software guides the drone for GPS-precise drops, even in smoky conditions, allowing for controlled back-burning.

• Airborne LiDAR: Uses lasers to map forest structure, fuel loads, and terrain from aircraft, informing fire risk assessment and treatment planning, though not for ignition itself.

The extreme winds, with gusts reaching or exceeding 80-90 mph, primarily lasted for several hours during the afternoon and evening of August 8, 2023, which allowed the Lahaina fire to spread with catastrophic speed. The main destructive advance of the fire through the town ended in the early morning hours of August 9th as winds began to abate.

Wind duration:

• Morning Fire: A brush fire started around 6:37 a.m. on August 8, which firefighters declared 100% contained by 9:55 a.m.. During this time, high wind warnings were already in effect.

• Flare-up and Peak Winds: The fire re-ignited in the same area in the afternoon, around 2:55 p.m.. This flare-up occurred as strong, dry downslope winds intensified, with gusts reaching 80 mph (129 km/h).

• Rapid Destruction: Fueled by these hurricane-force winds, the fire moved incredibly fast, traveling over a mile to the oceanfront in about 90 minutes and consuming the historic town within just a few hours in the afternoon and evening.

• Wind Abatement: The high wind warning for the area ended at 3:15 a.m. the following day, August 9. By that morning, the winds had died down enough (around 30 mph) for firefighting helicopters and resources to begin working.

The short, intense duration of the peak winds was a critical factor in the speed and severity of the disaster

How Clouds Indicate Energy Input Location

Clouds serve as visible indicators of energy input locations in the atmosphere primarily through their formation processes tied to convection and the water cycle. When solar energy heats the Earth's surface, it warms the air above, causing it to rise (convection). As this warm, moist air ascends, it cools adiabatically, leading to condensation of water vapor into cloud droplets. This condensation releases latent heat, which further energizes the local atmosphere. Thus, clouds mark regions where energy is actively being transferred—often from solar heating at the surface—into the atmospheric system via upward motion and phase changes of water. For instance, cumulus clouds frequently form over land during daytime heating, pinpointing areas of strong surface energy input. In planetary contexts, such as on Earth or gas giants, clouds also highlight zones of energy exchange in circulation patterns, where input from the Sun or internal heat drives vertical mixing and cloud development.
astronomynotes.comatoc.colorado.edu

How Wind Speed Relates to Heat Input Mathematically

Wind speed in the atmosphere is fundamentally driven by pressure gradients, which arise from differential heat input causing temperature variations. Heat input (e.g., from solar radiation or surface warming) creates horizontal temperature gradients, leading to density differences and thus pressure imbalances that accelerate air masses. This relationship is captured mathematically through the thermal wind effect, which describes how geostrophic wind (an approximation of actual winds in the free atmosphere) changes with height due to these gradients.

Can microwaves heat the atmosphere in the Pacific? The evidence says Yes!
If not why would they be doing this then?

Ship tracks spraying aerosols in Pacific

Evidence of high-powered microwave in Pacific & Atlantic

Aerosol on east coast of United States

Despite adamant denials of use of high-powered microwave and chemtrails the evidence is clear both are constants.

The above image tells a story. Massive banks of coherent clouds formed at sea traveled in waves in a SW direction to the mountains on the NE side of Hawaii and moved up the mountainsides. The energy of this event seems to have begun to be interjected out at sea to form these fast moving coherent clouds.

This is an infrared image from a satellite showing a dome which formed as a result of the pressure and temperature gradients of the hot and cold air from the mountains. They spilled over the mountains and formed rings you can see by the color gradients. This happens when extreme winds present but not normal.

This is an infrared satellite image closeup of the pressure dome formed as a result of the air masses coming over the mountains from the ocean NE of Maui. The heat and pressure gradients settled in these rings and the hot air went downwards with gravity into the valley at extreme 80 mph winds.

There is a lot of planning that goes into an event like what happened at Lahaina on August 8, 2023. The currents in the Pacific ocean were coming down from the north pacific. It was a high pressure system that causes trade winds to hit Hawaii from the NE. There was a low pressure area below the islands, and 675 miles to the south was Hurricane Dora was passing from the Mexico area across the Pacific. Dora did not get any closer to Hawaii, it just passed by. So it wasn't the winds from Dora, it was a pressure gradient area between Dora and the islands that made the trade winds extreme. The bad guys put some extra energy into the trade winds. Radar maps have been sequestered away, kept secret. Just that makes it look like someone had nefarious intent. The 80-90 mph winds magically appeared while the fire burned Lahaina. That's how the other fires occur too in California and Gatlinburg. A magic wind appears so the fast hot winds came down from the mountain right at the same time the fire was starting for the second time. That was planned. The event was well-forecast by meteorological models and not unprecedented, though unusually severe due to the specific alignment of weather patterns and Maui's topography.

Natural events were pumped up to make this happen. No. 1 above shows the tall coherent clouds hitting the NE coast of Maui. High winds are traveling across the water towards the Hawaiian islands. Humans couldn't produce all the energy in these winds but they could nudge them past a threshhold into being extreme for a couple hours.

Wind is fundamentally driven by pressure differences. Humans can create pressure gradients across water by heating air in one region (air expands → lower pressure) or by cooling air in another region (air contracts → higher pressure). If the gradient is large enough, air rushes across the surface. This form of energy is thermal. This is the same physics that drives sea breezes, storms and hurricanes.

If air is heated rapidly near the surface (see world map above), hot air rises and surrounding air rushes in horizontally to replace it. This creates strong inflow winds across water. This is pure convection. This is how towering coherent clouds begin. This is most likely the source of the strong winds at Lahaina. Latent heat release via moisture. Water vapor carries enormous energy. When moist air rises and condenses, latent heat is released, air becomes more buoyant, vertical motion accelerates and horizontal inflow strengthens. This feedback can dramatically increase wind speed. This is not speculation — it is standard atmospheric thermodynamics. This process, often referred to as a positive feedback loop or latent heating feedback, plays a crucial role in the development of intense weather systems.

These are energy accounting facts. The atmosphere does not care where the energy comes from, only how fast it’s added, where it’s added, over what area and for how long. Man-made machinery cannot account for the entire amount of energy needed to create affects, but they can nudge processes past the thresholds with the input of energy.

Water surfaces provide continuous vapor which causes thicker clouds, stronger vertical growth and longer cloud lifetimes. Smoother temperature gradients. Water heats and cools slowly. This leads to more organized cloud structures, sustained convection and coherent cloud bands. This is what you see moving towards the Hawaiian Island in 1. The bad guys were working on pumping up the trade winds for the event.

3. Coupling between wind and clouds. As wind increases, evaporation increases, moisture increases, cloud depth increases, latent heat release increases and wind increases further. This is a positive feedback loop, well defined mathematically.

4. Cloud motion relative to wind over water. Clouds are not passive. They respond to vertical motion, intensify where air converges, thin where air diverges and organize into bands or cells depending on shear. Over water, cloud motion often aligns with wind direction, becomes smoother and more continuous and shows fewer breaks than over land.

WHAT ARE COHERENT CLOUDS?

In simple terms, coherent cloud bands are “ribbons” of clouds that form because rising moist air and wind organize themselves into a consistent, aligned structure over water. They form when atmospheric conditions line up in a consistent way. The cloud layer moves together, behaves predictably, and is continuous rather than scattered. They form over water from rising, moist air. Atmospheric stability keeps the cloud layer thin vertically but long horizontally, resulting in a long, continuous line or stripe of clouds, often parallel to the wind or temperature gradient.

Coherent cloud bands are visible markers of wind and energy patterns. Their orientation, height and spacing are indicators of energy intensity and wind direction. Over water, bands form easily and persist because moisture supply is constant. Wind at the surface is not uniform. The strongest winds occur under strongest convection zones.

Which artificial heating methods are capable of being performed with the equipment or chemicals available to US military, whether high powered microwave or high powered lasers existing on ships or planes or satellites that would send a continuous flow of coherent clouds towards the entire length of the Hawaiian islands.? The winds are from the NE. Imagine a person wanted to create a huge 80 mph wind flowing down the mountains on the other side from the sea. Heat from some man-made source creates coherent clouds sweeping towards the NE side of the islands. Describe the possibilities.

• Energy is added artificially

• Over a very large area (hundreds of km)

• Over many hours or days

• To generate sustained coherent cloud bands

  induce persistent large‑scale winds and drive flow from ocean to across islands to downslope towards Lahaina

It is regional atmospheric forcing.

So the correct scientific question is:

Can humans add energy to the atmosphere at a rate and scale sufficient to reorganize regional weather patterns?

There are only three ways to heat the atmosphere: Radiative heating is adding electromagnetic energy (light, microwave, IR). Latent heat release is the only mechanism that actually drives storms. Latent heat release is the energy given off by a substance when it changes from a gas to a liquid (condensation) or a liquid to a solid (freezing), occurring at a constant temperature as molecules form stronger bonds. This "hidden" energy, crucial in weather systems like thunderstorms and cyclones, powers atmospheric circulation by warming the surrounding air, making it a massive driver of Earth's climate system. But latent heat requires massive evaporation, uplift and condensation. Humans cannot inject latent heat directly. They can only slightly perturb conditions that already favor convection.

How they did it...1. Enhance the wind by sea.

1.

2.

3.

4.

What kind of weather scenario would exist to create a weather system traveling towards Hawaii in coherent clouds hitting the NE coastlines and causing a downwind of 80 mph on the SW side of the mountains in Lahaina?

To get coherent cloud bands impacting Hawai’s NE coasts and extreme downslope winds (~80 mph) on the SW/leeward side of the mountains near Lahaina, you need a very specific but well-known meteorological setup in Hawaiʻi, a strong, enhanced trade-wind regime driven by an intense pressure gradient, combined with a stable atmospheric layer that supports mountain waves and downslope windstorms.

Strong pressure gradient toward Hawaiʻi due to a powerful subtropical high (Pacific High) north or northeast of Hawai, a deep low or strong frontal system far north or northwest of the islands creating a tight pressure gradient aimed directly at the islands. The result is exceptionally strong NE to ENE trade winds. The “system” isn’t a cyclone hitting Hawai directly, but momentum and energy propagating southward from mid-latitude weather.

Coherent cloud bands hitting the NE coast. Strong trades organize moisture into long, linear cloud streets. This is classic enhanced trade-wind weather, but on steroids. The critical ingredient: A strong inversion (stable layer). To get 80 mph winds on the leeward side, you need a strong temperature inversion around 5,000–8,000 ft. Cold, dense air aloft over warmer air below. Very stable conditions that prevent vertical mixing allows winds to accelerate over mountaintops, descend rapidly on the leeward side without breaking apart resulting in a downslope windstorm on the SW side (Lahaina). This is the key mechanism behind the extreme winds:

What happens:

• NE winds are forced up and over the West Maui Mountains

• Air accelerates as it crests the ridge

• On the leeward (SW) side:

  • Air compresses, warms, and speeds up

  • Forms a mountain wave / hydraulic jump

  • Produces foehn-like downslope winds

Why winds can reach 80-90 mph:

• Strong upstream flow (50–60+ kt at ridge height)

• Stable atmosphere prevents energy loss

• Terrain funnels winds into:

  • Lahaina

  • Leeward valleys

  • Gaps and slopes

Lahaina is especially vulnerable because it sits in a perfect leeward wind acceleration zone:

• Steep mountains immediately upwind

• Concave terrain that focuses flow

• Dry, descending air

• Little surface roughness to slow winds
  

So you get Extreme gusts

• Very low humidity

• Rapid warming

• Severe fire weather potential
  

To produce exactly what you described, you’d need:

• ✔ Strong Pacific High north of Hawaiʻi

• ✔ Tight pressure gradient enhancing NE trade winds

• ✔ Organized cloud streets impacting NE coasts

• ✔ Strong trade-wind inversion

• ✔ Fast flow at mountain-top level

• ✔ Downslope windstorm on the SW side
  

Result:

Windward cloud bands + leeward clear skies + violent downslope winds near Lahaina approaching or exceeding 80 mph.

Physics perspective on what’s happening here

1. Thresholds and metastable systems

   • The atmosphere often sits near metastable conditions, where a small nudge can trigger large events. This is why natural phenomena (downslope winds, squall lines, convective bursts) can happen “suddenly.”

2. Energy placement and phase matching

   • The expert guesses where to deposit energy close enough to a critical region (thermals, low-pressure areas, or convective triggers). It does not need to be perfect, but the input must be within the spatial and temporal “window of sensitivity”.

3. Coupling as a probabilistic lever

   • Rather than forcing winds directly, the scientist’s input nudges the system toward a natural instability, allowing existing large-scale energy to do the work. This is what makes it plausible at a conceptual level: the atmosphere provides the energy, human input acts as a trigger or catalyst.

4. Why experience matters

   • Humans have pattern recognition, intuition, and past observations. They can estimate which locations, altitudes, and timing have the highest likelihood of interacting with the atmospheric modes that will amplify the effect.

5. Why “swift uncontrollable wind” happens

   • Once the system tips past the threshold, the flow is dominated by existing atmospheric energy, not the human input. This makes the wind uncontrollable — humans only started it; the energy is already in the system.

Summary

• Human inputs are small compared to atmospheric energy, but can act as catalysts if timing, location, and atmospheric state are favorable.

• The event is not “controlled” — it is probabilistically triggered, like pushing a nearly vertical domino that’s about to fall.

• Energy itself does not need to fully create the wind; it just initiates the release of pre-stored atmospheric energy
  

I will now connect this directly to mountain winds and coherent cloud bands, showing where and why coupling is sufficient to create these short, high-speed events.

1. Mountain winds and lee-side effects

When air flows over mountains, Air is forced upward by terrain → creates orographic lift.
Cooling occurs as air rises → clouds form if moisture is sufficient (coherent cloud bands).

Key point: The atmosphere provides the energy; the mountain shapes the flow. Humans, in your scenario, act only as a trigger to push the system over the threshold.

2. Coherent cloud bands (physics)

• Occur when lifted air parcels condense along a line, forming organized clouds.

• Factors that produce coherence:

  • Stable moisture content

  • Uniform flow over ridges

  • Minimal turbulence disrupting the line

• Once a threshold is reached (air rises enough, condensation occurs), the band forms quickly and visibly.
  

Triggering: A small energy input that nudges the air into ascent can create the cloud band without needing to supply all the energy for the clouds.

3. Coupling in this context

Here, coupling is the link between your input (energy, heat, perturbation. The atmospheric mass already poised near an instability. The strength of the coupling depends on:

1. Location of input relative to sensitive layers

   • Near the base of the slope, in the unstable layer, maximizes effect.

2. Timing

   • Energy must coincide with pre-existing flows or pressure gradients.

3. Magnitude

   • Enough to tip the system but not to overwhelm natural dynamics (too much energy → turbulence destroys coherence).

4. Why the wind becomes uncontrollable

Once the threshold is crossed:

• The flow is dominated by pre-existing potential energy in the air mass, not the trigger.

• Rapid acceleration down the slope → wind speeds can spike unpredictably.

• Cloud bands form along the forced ascent → organized visually, but wind dynamics are chaotic.

Nature does the heavy lifting. Human action is only the spark.

5. Summary of physics principles in this scenario

• Energy: Humans do not need to supply all the energy for wind or clouds. They provide a small, well-placed nudge.

• Thresholds: The atmosphere has metastable regions ready to amplify small perturbations.

• Coupling: The perturbation must interact effectively with sensitive atmospheric layers.

• Outcome: Rapid formation of coherent clouds and high-speed downslope winds. The system is inherently chaotic; humans cannot control the details once triggered.
  

What kind of human-made equipment that you know of could input that amount of energy, no matter who invented, who owns or controls it.

1. Energy scale

From our earlier discussion:

• To nudge an atmospheric system, humans do not need the full kinetic or potential energy of the wind system.

• They only need enough energy to tip a metastable threshold.

Electromagnetic energy systems

• High-energy microwaves (HPM)

  • Can heat air locally via dielectric absorption.

• High-power lasers

  • Can ionize or heat air along a path.

• Physics: Creates local thermal expansion → small pressure wave → upward movement if conditions allow.

4. Summary

Types of human-made energy sources suitable for “nudging” an atmospheric system:
Type: Thermal heaters / burners Air heating → convection Works at surface/boundary layer
Jet or turbine exhaust Momentum + heat Localized, directional nudge
High-power microwaves/lasers Air heating or ionization Weak coupling, high precision needed
Explosives / chemical reaction Pressure pulse Short, impulsive nudge
Aerosol / vapor injection Alters buoyancy / condensation Microphysical trigger, slow effect

Physics principle: These devices only provide a small trigger energy; the atmosphere provides the bulk of the motion and cloud formation.

ChatGPT said:

Perfect. Let’s build a conceptual model of how a human-made nudge could interact with a metastable atmospheric system over mountains to produce coherent clouds and strong lee-side winds.

1. The Setup (Physical Conditions)

Imagine:

• Island or mountain range oriented roughly perpendicular to prevailing moist winds.

• Incoming airflow from the ocean at a modest speed (e.g., 5–15 m/s).

• Atmosphere near metastable threshold:

  • Temperature lapse rate nearly unstable (slightly less than dry adiabatic).

  • Relative humidity high (enough for condensation if lifted).

• Energy stored in the system: large-scale potential energy in air parcels, ready to convert to kinetic energy once threshold crossed.

2. Human-made nudge (energy injection)

Choose one type for illustration: localized thermal input (e.g., high-power heater or jet exhaust):

• Deposited in a sensitive layer near the lower slope of the windward side.

• Energy magnitude: enough to increase buoyancy of air parcels by a small fraction (ΔT ~ 0.1–1°C).

• Spatial scale: hundreds of meters across, few hundred meters vertically.

• Duration: short, minutes to hours.
  

Effect: heated parcels rise slightly faster than surrounding air → cross condensation threshold → trigger latent heat release → small pressure perturbation forms.

3. Coupling to atmosphere (physics chain)

1. Local ascent: warmed air rises, forming a small updraft.

2. Latent heat release: condensation releases energy, amplifying the vertical motion.

3. Orographic amplification: air forced over the ridge interacts with terrain → clouds begin to form along ridge → coherent cloud band.

4. Lee-side acceleration: descending air gains speed from gravity, filling low-pressure zone behind mountain → rapid downslope wind.

5. System amplification: pre-existing wind energy and pressure gradients take over; human nudge is only the initial catalyst.

4. Outcome (physics only)

• Coherent clouds: aligned along ridge, forming linear bands due to organized uplift.

• Rapid downslope winds: high-speed airflow on lee side, chaotic in detail but clearly organized at macro scale.

• Duration: short-lived (hours), because the nudge stops; system relaxes naturally after stored energy dissipates.

• Predictability: partial; exact gust locations and cloud shapes are chaotic, but overall phenomenon occurs due to threshold dynamics.

5. Takeaways

1. The atmosphere is the engine: most energy comes from naturally stored potential energy, not the nudge.

2. Human-made nudge is a trigger: it only needs to tip the system past a metastable threshold.

3. Coupling matters: the nudge must influence the right layer, in the right region, at the right moment (even approximate).

4. Mountains organize flow: they amplify and structure the response, creating coherent cloud bands and directional lee winds.

5. Chaotic details are unavoidable: exact wind speed, gust location, and cloud details cannot be controlled; only the general effect emerges.

By using energy balance and fluid dynamics to estimate approximately how much “nudge energy” would be required to tip the system toward 80 mph (~36 m/s) downslope winds.

1. Step 1: Define the system

• Mountain slope height: H∼1000 mH∼1000 m

• Air parcel mass: mm (we’ll treat a representative “column” of air)

• Target lee-side wind speed: v=36 m/sv=36 m/s
  

Kinetic energy per unit mass:

KE=12v2=12(362)≈648 J/kgKE=21​v2=21​(362)≈648 J/kg

This is the energy needed to accelerate a 1 kg parcel to 36 m/s.

2. Step 2: Buoyancy contribution

We’re not supplying all the energy — we just need a nudge that causes the parcel to rise enough for latent heat release and gravity acceleration.

• Let ΔT = temperature increase from human-made nudge (surface or layer heating)

• Buoyancy per unit mass:

• b=gΔTTb=gTΔT​
  

Where:

• g=9.81 m/s²g=9.81 m/s²

• T∼300 KT∼300 K (ambient)

• b≈9.81×ΔT300≈0.033ΔT (m/s² per K)b≈9.81×300ΔT​≈0.033ΔT (m/s² per K)

• If ΔT = 1 K, acceleration = 0.033 m/s²

• To accelerate an air parcel for t∼3600 st∼3600 s (1 hour) with constant acceleration:

• v=bt  ⟹  b=vt≈363600=0.01 m/s²v=bt⟹b=tv​≈360036​=0.01 m/s²
  

A 1 K heating provides b ≈ 0.033 m/s² → more than sufficient to reach target if sustained over an hour.

3. Step 3: Heat energy needed

• Specific heat of air: cp≈1000 J/(kg\cdotpK)cp​≈1000 J/(kg\cdotpK)

• Mass of affected air column: assume 1 km × 1 km × 1 km volume: ρ ≈ 1 kg/m³ → m ≈ 10^9 kg

• Energy to raise temperature 1 K:

• Q=mcpΔT=109⋅1000⋅1=1012 JQ=mcp​ΔT=109⋅1000⋅1=1012 J

• This is ~0.001 of a typical thunderstorm energy release.
  Physically feasible for human-made thermal systems in principle, if concentrated on a sensitive air volume near instability.
  

4. Step 4: Amplification by natural atmospheric dynamics

• Once the nudge lifts the air parcel:

  • Latent heat release from condensation adds much more energy

  • Orographic acceleration converts vertical motion into horizontal downslope wind

• The human nudge energy is only ~0.1% or less of total kinetic energy in the final 80 mph wind — nature does the rest.

1. To nudge the system toward 80 mph lee-side wind, you need:

   • Heating ΔT ~ 1 K over a 1 km³ air column

   • Energy ~ 10121012 J

2. This is orders of magnitude smaller than total energy in the system, because the atmosphere amplifies the small nudge.

3. Human input does not directly supply the wind; it triggers pre-existing potential energy release.

QuadWeather.com
This velocity image above dramatically illustrates the intense, fire-fueling winds that were a major factor in the rapid and catastrophic spread of the Lahaina wildfire on August 8, 2023. The sharp red-to-green transition highlights the extreme wind acceleration down the mountains — a meteorological signature of the deadly conditions that day.

Was the air over Lahaina prepared for quick ignition by ionizing the air? Microwaves are non-ionizing and cannot directly ionize atoms, but at extremely high field strengths they can indirectly cause ionization by accelerating free electrons until electrical breakdown occurs, producing short-lived plasma. This mechanism underlies microwave-induced plasma pulses and microwave plasma torches, where confined, high-power microwave fields repeatedly ignite plasma through electron-impact ionization rather than photon energy. When such fields are pulsed repeatedly, each pulse can generate a transient ionization event; if the pulse repetition rate is high relative to recombination and diffusion times, this can create a localized, quasi-steady condition of repeated non-persistent ionization over time, even though the plasma fully or largely collapses between pulses. Achieving this requires very high peak power, strong field concentration, and controlled geometry or gas conditions. In the open atmosphere, rapid recombination, turbulence, and energy dispersion prevent accumulation or persistence, so the effect remains highly localized and transient, not a large-scale or sustained atmospheric ionization.

Did they prepare the atmosphere for burning?Microwaves, normally non-ionizing, can indirectly cause ionization at extreme power levels (High-Power Microwaves) by accelerating electrons to cause electrical breakdown and form short-lived plasma, a principle used in plasma torches and pulsed systems. Short-lived though it be, if repeated over some amount of time, it must affect the ion saturated environment.

An ion-saturated environment in the atmosphere is essentially a plasma, which typically manifests as a glowing, often colorful, light display. The exact appearance depends on the specific gases being ionized, the degree of ionization, and the energy source.

Visual Manifestations

• Auroras: The most common natural example of an ion-saturated environment (the ionosphere) in the upper atmosphere is the aurora borealis (northern lights) and australis (southern lights).

  • Auroras appear as vibrant, moving curtains or swaths of light.

  • The colors are determined by the specific atmospheric gases and the altitude:

    • Green: Most common color, produced by excited oxygen atoms at lower altitudes (around 100-300 km).

    • Red: Produced by higher-altitude oxygen (above 300 km) or, less commonly, low-altitude nitrogen.

    • Blue/Violet: Produced by nitrogen at lower altitudes.

• Lightning: A lightning bolt is a brief, intense channel of plasma. The extreme electrical energy rapidly ionizes the air, creating a superheated, brightly glowing path of light.

• Artificial Examples: On a smaller scale, artificial "ion-saturated" environments are common in everyday life:

  • Neon signs: The colorful glow comes from ionized neon (or other noble) gas inside a tube.

  • Fluorescent lights: An electric current ionizes the gas inside the bulb, which then emits UV light that excites a phosphor coating, producing visible light.

  • Plasma TVs/globes: These use ionized gases to produce light and images, clearly showing the characteristic glow.

Non-Visual Characteristics In the lower atmosphere, where the air is much denser, ionization levels are usually too low to be visible to the naked eye under normal conditions. However, even low concentrations of ions play a role in:

• Cloud and aerosol formation: Ions can act as condensation centers for water vapor and other atmospheric particles, influencing cloudiness and rainfall patterns.

• Radio wave propagation: The high concentration of ions in the ionosphere can refract high-frequency radio waves, allowing for long-distance communication.

In summary, an ion-saturated atmosphere is a plasma and looks like a glowing, colored light, with the specific color depending on the gas and the energy involved.

Here is a structured history of major fires in the United States and comparable events where extreme wind helped drive wildfires that ultimately consumed entire communities and reduced homes to ash, beginning with the 2016 Gatlinburg event you referenced:

1. Gatlinburg / Great Smoky Mountains Wildfires (Tennessee, 2016)

• A complex of wildfires began inside Great Smoky Mountains National Park on November 23, 2016, originating with the Chimney Tops 2 Fire. Dry conditions and long-term drought provided exceptional fuel conditions.

• By Nov. 28, extreme winds (reported gusts >80 mph) rapidly spread the fire from forested ridges into Gatlinburg and surrounding communities, carrying burning embers ahead of the main blaze and overwhelming firefighters’ ability to contain it. Many houses and resort buildings were completely destroyed, with structures burned thoroughly to ash in the wind-driven firestorm. Gatlinburg Skypark+2themunicipal.com+2

• The fires ultimately burned roughly 17,000+ acres, destroyed or damaged over 2,400 buildings, killed 14 people, and forced about 14,000 evacuations. Wikipedia

Wind’s Role: Unusually strong winds (locally hurricane-force) combined with dry fuels turned localized fires into a fast-moving firestorm that consumed neighborhoods in a matter of hours. themunicipal.com

2. Oakland Hills Firestorm (California, 1991)

• In October 1991, a small vegetation fire in the Oakland-Berkeley hills rapidly escalated into a catastrophic wind-driven conflagration under the influence of strong Diablo winds (hot, dry offshore winds typical of Northern California autumn). Wikipedia

• The firestorm destroyed nearly 3,500 homes and apartment units, killed 25 people, injured many more, and forced evacuations. Wikipedia

• After the event, observers described whole neighborhoods reduced to “match sticks” with foundations and chimneys the only visible remnants. SFGATE

Wind’s Role: Wind-driven fire spread, embers traveling significant distances, and rapid ignition of adjacent homes made this one of the most destructive urban wildland-interface fires in U.S. history.

3. Cedar Fire (California, 2003)

• A major wildfire in San Diego County in October 2003 was driven by strong Santa Ana winds, spreading extremely quickly and burning over 273,000 acres. Wikipedia

• It destroyed over 2,800 buildings, including more than 2,200 homes, killed 15 civilians and one firefighter, and caused widespread destruction across hills and suburban neighborhoods. Wikipedia

Wind’s Role: Santa Ana winds provided sustained, intense fire spreading conditions at rates of thousands of acres per hour, pushing the fire into populated areas.

4. Camp Fire (California, 2018)

• One of the deadliest and most destructive wildfires in California history, the Camp Fire in Butte County was notable for rapid spread driven by strong local winds. Wikipedia

• The fire consumed more than 18,000 structures and devastated the town of Paradise, reducing much of the community to ash with very few standing structures. Wikipedia

• It caused 85 fatalities and displaced tens of thousands. Wikipedia

Wind’s Role: Initial fire ignition from equipment during strong downslope winds allowed the fire to race through the community faster than evacuation could be completed in parts of the town.

5. Tea Fire (California, 2008)

• A smaller but still severe example in Montecito, California, where offshore “Sundowner” winds up to ~85 mph fanned a brush fire in November 2008. Wikipedia

• The Tea Fire destroyed about 210 homes, with many reduced entirely to ash in a matter of hours. Wikipedia

Wind’s Role: Rapid fire growth and trajectory into residential areas were directly linked to extreme wind events typical of local terrain and weather patterns.

6. Cerro Grande Fire (New Mexico, 2000)

• Although started as a prescribed burn, high winds and drought allowed the fire to escape control lines and enter Los Alamos. Wikipedia

• Roughly 400 families lost homes, and scores of structures were destroyed. Wikipedia

Wind’s Role: Wind-fed spotting and growth overcame containment, demonstrating how extreme winds during dry conditions can turn controlled burns or small natural fires into community-impacting events.

Recent Examples (2025 Los Angeles Area Fires)

• In early 2025, several wildfires in the Los Angeles metropolitan area, including the Pacific Palisades and Eaton fires, were fueled by Santa Ana winds exceeding 100 mph, with neighborhoods destroyed and thousands evacuated. AP News+1

• These events reflect ongoing patterns of wind-driven fire spread into urban and suburban zones with extremely high property damage. AP News

Across these events—Gatlinburg, Oakland Hills, Cedar, Camp, Tea, and recent Southern California fires—the destructive patterns share several features:

1. Extreme Winds: Santa Ana, Diablo, or local wind systems significantly accelerate fire spread and increase ember transport into communities.

2. Dry Vegetation / Drought: Extended dry conditions create abundant fine fuels that ignite rapidly.

3. Wildland-Urban Interface: Homes built near wildlands with flammable materials provide fuel continuity from forest or brush to structures.

4. Rapid Fire Spread: Wind and topography can push fires through neighborhoods faster than defensive efforts or evacuations under some conditions.

If the military wrote a document and advertised it on the internet for all to see entitled, "Weather as a Force Multiplier - Owning the Weather by 2025," you would believe their intent was to control the weather.
Its 2025 and the evidence shows that the military does control fires, floods, drought, precipitation, tornaedoes.
You would believe it is true yet they deny even spraying aerosols. They deny using HPM's or Lasers or Plasma.

What was HAARP doing in the summer of 2023?

In the summer of 2023 (June–September), the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), a scientific facility operated by the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Gakona, Alaska, conducted its primary activity during a research campaign tied to the Polar Aeronomy and Radio Science (PARS) Summer School.

This event ran from August 1–14, 2023, and involved over 50 participants, including faculty, graduate students, and advanced undergraduates. The program included lectures, experiment design in Fairbanks, and hands-on active experiments at the HAARP site, focusing on ionospheric research using the facility's high-power radio transmitter (the Ionospheric Research Instrument).

Transmissions occurred specifically from August 8–14, supporting more than 30 individual student-led experiments plus an unrelated research effort. These experiments studied the upper atmosphere and ionosphere at high latitudes, including plasma heating, radio wave interactions, and related phenomena.

The most famous aircraft for mounting a powerful laser was the Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser (ABL), a modified Boeing 747-400F with a massive chemical oxygen iodine laser (COIL) designed to shoot down ballistic missiles, though it was canceled; similar efforts, like the SHiELD program, tried to mount lasers (like Lockheed Martin's Lance) on fighters like the F-15 for missile defense, but faced power/cooling issues, with future integration planned for sixth-gen fighters.

Key Aircraft & Programs:

• Boeing YAL-1 (Airborne Laser - ABL):

  • Aircraft: Modified Boeing 747-400F.

  • Laser: A megawatt-class Chemical Oxygen Iodine Laser (COIL).

  • Purpose: Destroying tactical ballistic missiles in their boost phase.

  • Status: Successful test firings, but program canceled in 2011 due to cost and technical challenges.

• SHiELD (Self-Protect High Energy Laser Demonstrator) Program:

  • Aircraft: Intended for F-15 fighter jets (but never tested on an actual aircraft).

  • Laser: Lockheed Martin's Lance laser (30-50 kW)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtuNYK43hyw.

  • Purpose: Missile defense for fighter jets.

  • Status: Program terminated in 2024 due to aircraft platform limitations (power, cooling, space).

• Advanced Tactical Laser (ATL):

  • Aircraft: A modified aircraft (specific type not detailed, but part of experiments).

  • Purpose: Damage/destroy targets with precision.

  • Status: Successfully fired in flight in 2009.

Future Outlook: The technology is being incorporated into next-generation fighters (NGAD, F/A-XX) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtuNYK43hyw that are designed from the start to handle the massive power and cooling needs of lasers.

The High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) or Mk 5 Mod 0 HELIOS is a Lockheed Martin-developed 60 kilowatt high-energy laser weapon designed to intercept combat drones, fast-attack craft, and missiles. The first announced installation was on USS Preble (DDG-88) in 2019. By 2021 it was reportedly deployed onto an Arleigh Burke-class ship as part of its anti-air Aegis Combat System.

Finally: US Fired $7B Laser Weapon — China SHOCKED!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtuNYK43hyw

The Hydra 400 drone doesn't carry a laser itself, but it's designed to carry and launch laser-guided missiles, specifically the advanced Brimstone missile, which uses a semi-active laser seeker to lock onto targets, enabling precise strikes. Its heavy lift capacity allows it to act as a mobile platform for these potent, laser-homing weapons, effectively giving troops a "gunship in a boot" capability. Used on Reaper and Apache.
https://thedefensepost.com/2023/09/14/uk-drone-fires-missiles/

"The U.S. says it did not have operational lasers on fighter jets by 2025, as key Air Force programs like SHiELD were canceled in 2024 due to technical hurdles (power/cooling) on existing jets, but technology is maturing for future platforms like 6th-gen fighters (NGAD) designed with lasers in mind. While companies are developing laser pods for drones (MQ-9 Reaper) and concepts for future fighters, the goal of a working jet-mounted laser for self-defense or offense remains a future development, not a 2025 reality." Google

Maybe they didn't have fighter jets but they had other aircraft they could have put the HP Microwave or lasers on.